1. De Fombelle, A., Julliand, V., Drogoul, C. and Jacotot, E. 2001. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses: 1-Effects of an abrupt incorporation of two levels of barley in a hay diet on microbial profile and activities. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 21:439–444.
2. Dehority, B.A. and Scott, H.W. 1967. Extent of cellulose and hemicellulose digestion in various forages by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 50:1136.
3. Franzolin, R. and Dehority, B.A. 1996. Effect of prolonged high concentrate feeding on ruminal protozoal concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 2803–2809.
4. Frape, D., 2004. Equine Nutrition and Feeding. 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. PP 650.
5. Garner, H.E., Moore, J.N., Johnson, J.H., Clark, L., Amend, J.F., Tritschler, L.G. and Coffman, J.R. 1998. Changes in the cecal flora associated with the onset of laminitis. Equine Vet. J. 10: 249–252.
6. Goodson, J. 1981. Effects of an abrupt change in ration, from all forage to concentrate, on the microbial populations and ecology of the pony cecum. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
7. Goodson, J., Tyznik, W., Cline, J. and Dehority, B. 1988. Effects of an abrupt change of diet from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical
environment in the caecum of the pony. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.54: 1946-1950.
8. Hoover, W.H., Tucker, C., Harris, J., Sniffen, C.J. and de Ondarza, M.B. 2006. Effects of non-structural carbohydrate level and starch: sugar ratio on microbial metabolism in continuous culture of rumen contents. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 128:307–319.
9. Hoover, W.H., Tucker, C., Harris, J., Sniffen, C.J. and de Ondarza, M.B. 2006. Effects of non-structural carbohydrate level and starch: sugar ratio on microbial
metabolism in continuous culture of rumen contents. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 128:307–319.
10. Janis, C. 1976. The evolutionary strategy of the equidae and the origins of rumen and cecal digestion. Evolution. 30: 757–774.
11. Julliand, V., de Fombelle, A., Drogoul, C. and Jacotot, E. 2001. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses. 3. Effects of three hay: grain ratios on microbial profile and activities. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 21: 543–546.
12. Julliand, V., de Vaux, A., Millet, L. and Fonty, G. 1999. Identiccation of Ruminococcus favefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 3738^3741.
13. Kern, D.L., Slyter, L.L., Weaver, J.M., Leffel, E.C. and Samuelson, G. 1973. Pony cecum vs steer rumen: the effect of oats and hay on the microbial ecosystem. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 463-469.
14. Lin, C. and Stahl, D.A. 1995. Taxon-speci¢c probes for the cellulolytic genus Fibrobacter reveal abundant and novel equine-associated populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 1348-1351.
15. McLean, B.M.L., Hyslop, J.J., Longland, A.C., Cuddeford, D., and Hollands, T. 2000. Physical processing of barley and its effects on intra-caecal fermentation parameters in ponies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 85, 79–87.
16. Medina, M., Girard, I.D., Jacotot, E. and Julliand, V. 2002. Effect of a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on microbial profiles and fermentation patterns in the large intestine of horses fed a high fiber or a high starch diet. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 2600–2609.
17. Milinovich, G., Burrell, P., Pollitt, P., Klieve, A., Blackall, L., Ouwerkerk, D., Woodland, E. Trott, D. 2008. Microbial ecology of the equine hindgut during oligofructose-induced laminitis. The ISME Journal. 2: 1089–1100.
18. Moore, B.E. and Dehority, B.A. 1993. Effects of diet and hindgut definition on diet digestibility and microbial concentrations in the cecum and colon of the horse. Journal of Animal Science, 71: 3350–58.
19. Moore-Colyer, M.J.S., Hyslop, J., Longland, A. and Cuddeford, D. 2000. Intra-caecal fermentation parameters and in vivo apparent digestibility in ponies fed botanically diverse fibre-based diets. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 84: 183-197.
20. Peter, M., Katherine, M. and Jo-Anne, M. 2008. Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Brit. J. Nutr. 100: 561–568.
21. Santos, A., Rodrigues, M. Bessa, R., Ferreiral, L. and Martin-Rosset, W. 2011. Understanding the equine cecum-colon ecosystem: current knowledge and future perspectives. Animal. 5: 48–56.
22. SAS Institute Inc. 2002. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) User’s Guide (Version 9.1), SAS Institute, Cary, NC, US.
23. Willard, J.G., Willard, J.C., Wolfram, S.A. and Baker, J.P. 1977. Effect of diet on cecal pH and feeding behavior of horses. J. Anim. Sci. 45:87–93.
)
