Genetic parameters for the residual variance of some body weight traits in Sangsari lambs

Author

Department of Agriculture , Minab Higher Education Center, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The majority of selection and breeding programs for sheep focus on improving weight and growth traits. Body weight uniformity is a crucial economic characteristic within the industry of sheep breeding. Birth weight is an important trait that has an optimal limit, and extremely high or extremely low birth weight can cause difficulties during birth, stillbirth, and problems such as dystocia, stillbirths, and diminished growth of lambs. The existence of genetic variability for the residual variance is a necessary condition for improving this trait through breeding. Recent studies have demonstrated that the residual variance is governed by additive genetic influences. The enhancement of uniformity in body weight traits can be achieved as an economic advantage by employing selection strategies that take into account the genetic variability of the residual variance. The present study was undertaken to ascertain variance components and genetic parameters pertaining to the residual variance of birth weight and weaning weight traits in Sangsari sheep. Also, the genetic correlation between these traits and their residual variance was calculated.
Materials and Methods: To carry out this study, the phenotypic data of 5986 lambs obtained between 1986 and 2016 from the Sangsari sheep breeding station were utilized. The traits examined comprised birth weight, weaning weight, and the residual variance associated with them. To incorporate fixed factors into the model and assess their impact on the examined traits, a least-squares analysis was conducted utilizing the GLM procedure of SAS software. The estimation of variance components and genetic parameters was conducted using the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) algorithm implemented in the DMU software, employing the DHGLM method. Firstly, an animal model was applied to estimate the residual variance of birth weight and weaning weight traits. Following that, a bivariate model was employed to examine the influence of additive genetic effects on the residual variance.
Results: The additive genetic standard deviations for the residual variance of birth weight and weaning weight were determined to be 7.74 and 17.90, respectively, consequently, a decrease of one standard deviation in the breeding value of residual variance resulted in a reduction of 7.74 and 17.90% in the uniformity of the respective traits. The heritability estimates for the mean and residual variance of birth weight and weaning weight were found to be 0.26 ± 0.09, 0.059 ± 0.003, 0.23 ± 0.06, and 0.037 ± 0.001, respectively. The genetic coefficient of variation was determined to be 0.58 for birth weight and 0.48 for weaning weight. The genetic correlation ranged from -0.16 for birth weight and residual variance to 0.11 for weaning weight and residual variance.
Conclusion: The results of the current study offer crucial information regarding the presence of additive genetic variation for the residual variance of birth weight and weaning weight within Sangsari sheep herds, which can be utilized to enhance uniformity by selecting for reduced residual variance. The selection for increasing birth weight resulted in a reduction of the breeding value of residual variance and an enhancement of herd uniformity, owing to the favorable genetic correlation observed between birth weight and its residual variance. The genetic correlation for weaning weight was found to be unfavorable, indicating that selecting for higher weaning weights led to increased heterogeneity within the herd.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Agha, S., Mekkawy, W., Ibanez‐Escriche, N., Lind, C.E., Kumar, J., Mandal, A. & Doeschl‐Wilson, A. (2018). Breeding for robustness: Investigating the genotype‐by‐environment interaction and micro‐ environmental sensitivity of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animal Genetics, 49(5), 421-427.
Argente, M.J., Calle, E.W., Garcia, M.L. & Blasco, A. (2017). Correlated response in litter size components in rabbits selected for litter size variability. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 134(6), 505-511.
Bangar, Y.C., Magotra, A. & Yadav A.S. (2020). Estimates of covariance components and genetic parameters for growth, average daily gain and Kleiber ratio in Harnali sheep. Tropical Animal Health Production, 52(5), 2291-2296.
Cottle, D.J., Gilmour, A.R., Pabiou, T., Amer, P.R. & Fahey, A.G. (2016). Genetic selection for increased mean and reduced variance of twinning rate in Belclare ewes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 133(2), 126-137.
Elgersma, G. G., de Jong, G., van der Linde, R. & Mulder, H. A. (2018). Fluctuations in milk yield are heritable and can be used as a resilience indicator to breed healthy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(2), 1240-1250.
Felleki, M., Lee, D., Lee, Y., Gilmour, A.R. & Rönnegård, L. (2012). Estimation of breeding values for mean and dispersion, their variance and correlation using double hierarchical generalized linear models. Genetics Research, 94(06), 307-317.
Foxpro, Version 2.6. (1993). Holding, Inc., All right reserved, Patent Pendling.
García‑Ballesteros, S., Villanueva, B., Fernández, J., Gutiérrez, J.B. & Cervantes., I. (2021). Genetic parameters for uniformity of harvest weight in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Genetics Selection Evolution, 53, 26.
Garreau, H., Bolet, G., Larzul, C., Robert-Granie, C., Saleil, G., SanCristobal, M. & Bodin, L. 2008. Results of four generations of a canalising selection for rabbit birth weight. Livestock Science, 119 (1-3), 55-62
Hill, W.G. & Mulder, H.A. (2010). Genetic analysis of environmental variation. Genetics Research, 92 (5-6), 381-395.
Ibanez‐Escriche, N., Varona, L., Sorensen, D. & Noguera, J.L. (2008). A study of heterogeneity of environmental variance for slaughter weight in pigs. Animal, 2(1), 19-26.
Iung, L.H.S., Carvalheiro, R., Neves, H.H.R. & Mulder, H.A. (2019). Genetics and genomics of uniformity and resilience in livestock and aquaculture species: A review. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 137(3), 263-280.
Iung, L.H.S., Mulder, H.A., Neves, H.H.R. & Carvalheiro, R. (2018). Genomic regions underlying uniformity of yearling weight in Nellore cattle evaluated under different response variables. BMC Genomics, 19, 619.
Iung, L.H.S., Neves, H.H.R., Mulder, H.A. & Carvalheiro, R. (2017). Genetic control of residual variance of yearling weight in Nellore beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 95(4):1425-1433.
Janhunen, M., Kause, A., Vehviläinen, H. & Järvisalo, O. (2012). Genetics of microenvironmental sensitivity of body weight in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) selected for improved growth. PLoS ONE, 7(6): 1-8.
Kasiriyan, M.M., Hafezian, S.H. & Hassani, N. (2011). Genetic polymorphism BMP15 and GDF9 genes in Sangsari sheep of Iran. International Journal of Genetic Molecular Biology, 3(1): 31-34.
Kause, A., Janhunen, M., Vehvilainen, H., Koskinen, H. & Nousiainen, A. (2014). Improving uniformity of growth by mating and selection strategies in rainbow trout. In: Proceedings of 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.
Latifi, M. and Mohammadi A. (2019). Estimation of genetic parameters of autosomal and sex-linked pre-weaning traits in Makuie sheep using multivariate analysis. Genetika, 51(2): 365-375.
Madsen, M., Van der Werf, J., Börner, V., Mulder, H. & Clark, S. (2021). Estimation of macro-and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity in unbalanced datasets. Animal, 15(12): 100411.
Marjanovic, J., Mulder, H.A., Khaw, H.L. & Bijma, P. (2016). Genetic parameters for uniformity of harvest weight and body size traits in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia. Genetics Selection Evolution, 48(1), 41.
Mulder, H.A., Bijma, P. & Hill, W.G. (2008). Selection for uniformity in livestock by exploiting genetic heterogeneity of residual variance. Genetics Selection Evolution, 40, 37-59.
Mulder, H.A., Bijma, P. & Hill, W.G. (2007). Prediction of breeding values and selection responses with genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance. Genetics, 175(4), 1895-1910.
Mulder, H.A., Gienapp, P. and Visser, M.E. (2016a). Genetic variation in variability: Phenotypic variability of fledging weight and its evolution in a songbird population. Evolution, 70(9): 2004-2016.
Mulder, H.A., Hill, W.G., Vereijken, A. & Veerkamp, R.F. (2009). Estimation of genetic variation in residual variance in female and male broilers. Animal, 3: 1673-1680.
Mulder, H.A., Rönnegård, L., Fikse, W.F., Veerkamp, R.F. & Strandberg, E. (2013). Estimation of genetic variance for macro‐ and micro‐environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models. Genetics Selection Evolution, 45 (1), 23.
Mulder, H.A., Visscher, J. & Fablet, J. (2016). Estimating the purebred‐crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens. Genetics Selection Evolution, 48(1): 39.
Neves, H.H.R., Carvalheiro, R. & Queiroz, S.A. (2012). Genetic and environmental heterogeneity of residual variance of weight traits in Nellore beef cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution, 44(1): 19.
Neves, H.H.R., Carvalheiro, R., Roso, V.M. & Queiroz, S.A. (2011). Genetic variability of residual variance of production traits in Nellore beef cattle. Livestock Science, 142 (1-3), 164-169.
Rafo, M.A., Cuyabano, B.C.D., Rincent, R., Sarup, P., Moreau, L., Mary-Huard., T. & Jensen, J. (2023). Genomic prediction for grain yield and micro-environmental sensitivity in winter wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 1-15.
Rönnegård, L., Felleki, M., Fikse, F., Mulder, H.A. & Strandberg, E. (2010). Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance ‐ estimation of variance components using double hierarchical generalized linear models. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42(1): 8.
Rönnegård, L., Felleki, M., Fikse, W.F., Mulder, H.A. & Strandberg, E. (2013). Variance component and breeding value estimation for genetic heterogeneity of residual variance in Swedish Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 96 (4): 2627-2636.
Sae‐Lim, P., Gjerde, B., Nielsen, H.M., Mulder, H. & Kause, A. (2016). A review of genotype‐by‐environment interaction and micro‐environmental sensitivity in aquaculture species. Reviews in Aquaculture, 8 (4): 369-393.
Sae‐Lim, P., Jakobsen, J.H. & Mulder, H.A. (2018). Uniformity in birth weight is heritable in Norwegian White Sheep. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.
Sae‐Lim, P., Kause, A., Janhunen, M., Vehviläinen, H., Koskinen, H., Gjerde, B. & Mulder, H.A. (2015). Genetic (co) variance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) body weight and its uniformity across production environments. Genetics Selection Evolution, 47 (1): 46.
Sae‐Lim, P., Kause, A., Lillehammer, M. & Mulder, H.A. (2017). Estimation of breeding values for uniformity of growth in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using pedigree relationships or single‐step genomic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution, 49(1): 33.
Sargolzaei, M., Iwaisaki, H. & Colleau, J.J. (2006). CFC: a tool for monitoring genetic diversity. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 13-18 August, 27-28: Instituto Prociência.
SAS. (2008). SAS User’s Guide Version. 9.2., SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC.
Sell-Kubiak, E., Bijma, P., Knol, E.F. & Mulder, H.A. (2015). Comparison of methods to study uniformity of traits: Application to birth weight in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 93(3): 900-911.
Sonesson, A.K., Ødegård, J. & Rönnegård, L. (2013). Genetic heterogeneity of within‐family variance of body weight in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genetics Selection Evolution, 45(1): 41.
Vandenplas, J., Bastin, C., Gengler, N. & Mulder, H.A. (2013). Genetic variance in micro‐environmental sensitivity for milk and milk quality in Walloon Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(9): 5977-5990.
Wolc, A., White, I.M.S., Avendano, S. & Hill, W.G. (2009). Genetic variability in residual variation of body weight and conformation scores in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 88: 1156-1161.
Yoshida, G.M., Yáñez, J.M., de Oliveira, C.A.L., Ribeiro, R.P., Lhorente, J.P., Queiroz, S.A. & Carvalheiro, R. (2018). Mate selection allows changing the genetic variability of the progeny while optimizing genetic response and controlling inbreeding. Aquaculture, 495: 409-414.
Zonuz, A., Alijani, S. & Rafat, S.A. (2019). Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance of hatch weight in Mazandaran native chicken. British Poultry Science, 60:366-372.
Journal of Ruminant Research
Volume 11, Issue 4
January 2024
Pages 93-108

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics