Comparison of heat-stressed purebred Holstein vs. crossbred Holstein × Montbeliarde and Holstein × Simmental cows: Production, reproduction, metabolism and health

Authors

1 Dasht-e-Naz Co., Sari, Mazandaran, Iran

2 Researcher, Ferdows Pars Agriculture-Livestock Holding Co., Tehran, Iran

3 Managing Director Ferdows Pars Agriculture-Livestock Holding Co

4 Ferdows Pars Agriculture-Livestock Holding Co., Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Comparison of heat stressed purebred Holstein vs. crossbred Holstein × Montbeliarde and Holstein × Simmental cows : Production, reproduction, metabolism and health
Abstract
Background and objectives : Crossbred lactating cows were hypothesized to outperform Holsteins under environmental stresses . The objective of this study was , therefore, to compare production, reproduction, metabolism and health of purebred Holstein cows vs . crossbred Holstein × Montbeliarde and Holstein×Simmental cows under hot and humid conditions of north of Iran ( Sari , Mazandaran ) .
Material and methods : Dairy crosses were produced by crossing Holstein ( H ) cows with Montbeliarde ( M ) and Simmental ( S ) bulls’ semen . The performance and health of 70 primiparous cows from each breed ( 210 cows in total) were compared during their first lactation . Blood samples were taken from 15 primiparous cows from each breed at stages of close-up , calving , 21 days after calving. Samples were analyzed for glucose , BHBA, NEFA, calcium and mangium . Statistical analyses were performed using SAS programs ( GLM and MIXED procedures ).
Results: Results showed that Montbeliarde × Holstein and Simmental×Holstein crossbred cows were not different (P> 0.05) from pure Holsteins in rectal temperature , fertility and other reproductive indices , 305-d milk yield, milk fat and protein yield, stillbirth, mastitis, and laminitis rates and close-up blood metabolites. However , Montbeliarde × Holstein cows had greater calving difficulty than did Simmental×Holstein cows (P < 0.05 ) . Also , both crossbred groups had higher incidence of metritis compared to purebred Holstein cows ( P < 0.05 ) . The purebred Holsteins exhibited more desirable udder traits than did crossbred cows (P < 0.05). The crossbred cows had more body condition score ( BCS ) during the transition period than did the pure Holsteins (p < 0.05 ). However, stature of Simmental × Holstein crossbred cows was shorter than pure Holstein . Foot angle was steeper for Holstein×Simmental and Holstein × Montbeliarde crossbred cows , but Holstein × Montbeliarde crossbred cows were similar to pure Holstein cows for hoof measurements .
Conclusions: findings of this study suggest that Holstein×Simmental and Holstein × Montbeliarde crossbred cows did not outperform first - lactation purebred Holstein cows, and that they experienced higher rates of dystocia and metritis under stressful hot and humid conditions .
Key words : Crossbreeding , Heat stress , Holstein , Mahdasht, Montbeliarde , Simmental

Keywords


  1.  Bretschneider, G., Arias, D.R. and Cuatrin, A. 2015. Comparative evaluation of udder and body conformation traits of first lactation ¾ Holstein x ¼ Jersey versus Holstein cows= Comparación de las características de conformación de la ubre y el cuerpo de vacas de primera lactancia ¾ Holstein x ¼ Jersey versus Holstein. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.

    1. Berman, A. 2005. Estimates of heat stress relief needs for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science. 83:1377-1384.
    2. Bernabucci, U., Lacetera, N., Baumgard, L.H., Rhoads RP., Ronchi, B. and Nardone A. 2010. Metabolic and hormonal acclimation to heat stress in domesticated ruminants. Animal. 4: 1167-1183.
    3. Bjelland, D.W., Weigel, K.A., Hoffman, PC., Esser, N.M., Coblentz, W.K. and Halbach, T.J. 2011. Production, reproduction, health, and growth traits in backcross Holstein×Jersey cows and their Holstein contemporaries. Journal of Dairy Science. 94:5194-5203.
    4. Cartmill, J.A., El-Zarkouny, S.Z., Hensley, B.A., Rozell, T.G., Smith, J.F. and Stevenson, J.S. 2001. An alternative AI breeding protocol for dairy cows exposed to elevated ambient temperatures before or after calving or both. Journal of Dairy Science. 84:799-806.
    5. Dechow, C.D., Rogers, G.W., Cooper, J.B., Phelps, M.I. and Mosholder, A.L. 2007. Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses. Journal of Dairy Science. 90:3542-3549.
    6. Dikmen, S. and Hansen PJ. 2009. Is the temperature-humidity index the best indicator of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a subtropical environment. Journal of Dairy Science. 92:109-116.
    7. Falconer, DS. and Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex: Longman. Pp:464.
    8. Hansen, LB. 2000. Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint. Journal of Dairy Science. 83:1145-1150.
    9. Häggman, J. and Juga, J. 2013. Genetic parameters for hoof disorders and feet and leg conformation traits in Finnish Holstein cows. Journal of dairy science. 96:3319-3325.
    10. Hazel, A.R., Heins, B.J., Seykora, A.J. and Hansen, L.B. 2014. Production, fertility, survival, and body measurements of Montbéliarde-sired crossbreds compared with pure Holsteins during their first 5 lactations. Journal of Dairy Science. 97:2512-2525.
    11. Heins, B.J., Hansen, L.B. and Seykora, A.J. 2006a. Production of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:2799-2804.
    12. Heins, BJ., Hansen, LB. and Seykora AJ. 2006b. Fertility and survival of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:4944-4951.
    13. Heins, B.J., Hansen, L.B. and Seykora, A.J. 2006c. Calving difficulty and stillbirths of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:2805-2810.
    14. Heins, BJ., Hansen, LB., Seykora, AJ., Hazel, AR., Johnson, DG. and Linn JG. 2008b. Crossbreds of Jersey× Holstein compared with pure Holsteins for body weight, body condition score, dry matter intake, and feed efficiency during the first one hundred fifty days of first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science. 91:3716-3722.
    15. Knob, DA., Alessio, DRM., Neto AT. and Mozzaquatro FD. 2016. Reproductive performance and survival of Holstein and Holstein× Simmental crossbred cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 48:1409-1413.
    16. McAllister AJ. 2002. Is crossbreeding the answer to questions of dairy breed utilization. Journal of Dairy Science. 85:2352-2357.
    17. Mendonça, L.G.D., Litherland, N.B., Lucy, M.C., Keisler, D.H., Ballou, M.A., Hansen, LB. and Chebel, R.C. 2013. Comparison of innate immune responses and somatotropic axis components of Holstein and Montbéliarde-sired crossbred dairy cows during the transition period. Journal of Dairy Science. 96:3588-3598.
    18. Mendonça, L.G.D., Abade, C.C, da Silva EM, Litherland, N.B., Hansen, L.B., Hansen, W.P. and Chebel, R.C. 2014. Comparison of peripartum metabolic status and postpartum health of Holstein and Montbeliarde-sired crossbred dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. 97: 805-818.
    19. Norman, H.D., Wright, J.R., Hubbard, S.M., Miller, R.H. and Hutchison, J.L. 2009. Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science. 92:3517-3528.
    20. Swalve, H.H. 2007. Crossbreeding in dairy cattle: International trends and results from crossbreeding data in Germany. Lohmann Information. 42:38-46.
    21. Shonka-Martin BN., Heins, BJ. and Hansen LB. 2019. Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake. Journal of Dairy Science. 102:3661-3673.
    22. Touchberry, R.W. 1992. Crossbreeding Effects in Dairy Cattle: The Illinois Experiment, 1949 to 19691. Journal of Dairy Science. 75:640-667.
    23. Vesely, J.A., McAllister, A.J., Lee, A.J., Batra, T.R., Lin, C.Y., Roy, G.L. and Winter, K.A. 1986. Reproductive performance of crossbred and purebred dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 69:518-526.

    25.Veerkamp, R.F., Beerda, B and Van der Lende, T. 2003. Effects of genetic selection for milk yield on energy balance, levels of hormones, and metabolites in lactating cattle, and possible links to reduced fertility. Livestock Production Science. 83:257-275.

    26.Zimbelman, R.B., Rhoads, R.P., Rhoads, M.L., Duff, G.C., Baumgard, L.H. and Collier R.J. 2009. A re-evaluation of the impact of temperature humidity index (THI) and black globe humidity index (BGHI) on milk production in high producing dairy cows. In Proceedings of the Southwest Nutrition Conference (ed. RJ Collier).Pp:158-169).